Mejor Linux Hosting (2026)
El mejor Linux Hosting, clasificado por los criterios que de verdad importan — benchmarks reales, specs, disponibilidad y precio, ponderados para este uso. Puntuación transparente, sin pago por posición.
-
Hostwinds scores 10.0 for Linux Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 10.0 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 63% 10.0 root/SSH Value 0% n/a no pricing yet Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 37% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 0% n/a no spec data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
DreamHost scores 9.1 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.89/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.1 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 63% 8.6 from $2.89/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 37% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 0% n/a no spec data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 8.9 Visit
GreenGeeks scores 8.9 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.95/mo) and reliability (99.8% uptime (30d)).
Why 8.9 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 63% 8.5 from $2.95/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 37% 9.6 99.8% uptime (30d) Resources 0% n/a no spec data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
UltaHost scores 8.8 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $3.80/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 8.8 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 63% 8.1 from $3.80/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 37% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 0% n/a no spec data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 8.8 Visit
DigitalOcean scores 8.8 for Linux Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and value (from $4.00/mo).
Why 8.8 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 31% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 8.0 from $4.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 19% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 19% 7.0 up to 16GB RAM / 8 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
IONOS scores 8.6 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $1.00/mo) and reliability (99.79% uptime (30d)).
Why 8.6 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 45% 9.5 from $1.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 27% 9.6 99.79% uptime (30d) Resources 27% 6.2 up to 19GB RAM / 1 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Contabo scores 8.2 for Linux Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and value (from $5.50/mo).
Why 8.2 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 31% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 7.3 from $5.50/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 19% 9.7 99.86% uptime (30d) Resources 19% 5.3 up to 12GB RAM / 6 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Hetzner scores 8.0 for Linux Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and value (from $4.59/mo).
Why 8.0 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 31% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 7.7 from $4.59/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 19% 9.9 99.93% uptime (30d) Resources 19% 3.5 up to 8GB RAM / 4 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 7.5 Visit
Hosting.com scores 7.5 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.99/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 7.5 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 45% 8.5 from $2.99/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 27% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 27% 3.5 up to 8GB RAM / 4 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Kamatera scores 7.5 for Linux Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and value (from $4.00/mo).
Why 7.5 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 31% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 8.0 from $4.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 19% 9.4 99.71% uptime (30d) Resources 19% 0.6 up to 1GB RAM / 1 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Vultr scores 7.5 for Linux Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and value (from $5.00/mo).
Why 7.5 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 31% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 7.5 from $5.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 19% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 19% 0.9 up to 2GB RAM / 1 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Linode scores 7.4 for Linux Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and value (from $5.00/mo).
Why 7.4 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 31% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 7.5 from $5.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 19% 10.0 99.98% uptime (30d) Resources 19% 0.6 up to 1GB RAM / 1 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 7.2 Visit
ChemiCloud scores 7.2 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.49/mo) and reliability (99.62% uptime (30d)).
Why 7.2 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 45% 8.8 from $2.49/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 27% 9.2 99.62% uptime (30d) Resources 27% 2.6 up to 6GB RAM / 3 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 7.2 Visit
SiteGround scores 7.2 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.99/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 7.2 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 45% 8.5 from $2.99/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 27% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 27% 2.1 up to 6GB RAM / 1 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Namecheap scores 7.0 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.28/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 7.0 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 45% 8.9 from $2.28/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 27% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 27% 0.9 up to 2GB RAM / 1 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Hostinger scores 6.9 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.99/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 6.9 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 45% 8.5 from $2.99/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 27% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 27% 1.1 up to 2GB RAM / 2 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Verpex scores 6.8 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.50/mo) and reliability (99.97% uptime (30d)).
Why 6.8 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 38% 3.0 control panel Value 38% 8.8 from $2.50/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 23% 9.9 99.97% uptime (30d) Resources 0% n/a no spec data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 6.8 Visit
InterServer scores 6.8 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.50/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 6.8 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 38% 3.0 control panel Value 38% 8.8 from $2.50/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 23% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 0% n/a no spec data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
FastComet scores 6.8 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.49/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 6.8 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 38% 3.0 control panel Value 38% 8.8 from $2.49/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 23% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 0% n/a no spec data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 6.8 Visit
HostArmada scores 6.8 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.49/mo) and reliability (99.85% uptime (30d)).
Why 6.8 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 38% 3.0 control panel Value 38% 8.8 from $2.49/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 23% 9.7 99.85% uptime (30d) Resources 0% n/a no spec data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 6.7 Visit
ScalaHosting scores 6.7 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $2.95/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 6.7 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 38% 3.0 control panel Value 38% 8.5 from $2.95/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 23% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 0% n/a no spec data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 6.6 Visit
InMotion Hosting scores 6.6 for Linux Hosting, led by value (from $4.99/mo) and reliability (99.98% uptime (30d)).
Why 6.6 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 45% 7.5 from $4.99/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 27% 10.0 99.98% uptime (30d) Resources 27% 1.8 up to 4GB RAM / 2 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Cloudways scores 6.5 for Linux Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 6.5 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 31% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 4.5 from $11.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 19% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Resources 19% 0.6 up to 1GB RAM / 1 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 5.7 Visit
TMDHosting scores 5.7 for Linux Hosting, led by reliability (99.99% uptime (30d)) and value (from $9.52/mo).
Why 5.7 for Linux Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 45% 5.2 from $9.52/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 27% 10.0 99.99% uptime (30d) Resources 27% 2.3 up to 4GB RAM / 4 vCPU Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
We earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It never changes our rankings: positions are set by our transparent HostingTweaks score, and commission only ever breaks a tie between genuinely comparable options.
Compara el conjunto
| Provider | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Hostwinds | 10.0 | — | — | 100% | — | Visit |
 DreamHost | 9.1 | — | — | 100% | $2.89 | Visit |
 GreenGeeks | 8.9 | — | — | 99.8% | $2.95 | Visit |
 UltaHost | 8.8 | — | — | 100% | $3.80 | Visit |
 DigitalOcean | 8.8 | — | — | 100% | $4.00 | Visit |
 IONOS | 8.6 | — | — | 99.79% | $1.00 | Visit |
 Contabo | 8.2 | — | — | 99.86% | $5.50 | Visit |
 Hetzner | 8.0 | — | — | 99.93% | $4.59 | Visit |
 Hosting.com | 7.5 | — | — | 100% | $2.99 | Visit |
 Kamatera | 7.5 | — | — | 99.71% | $4.00 | Visit |
 Vultr | 7.5 | — | — | 100% | $5.00 | Visit |
 Linode | 7.4 | — | — | 99.98% | $5.00 | Visit |
 ChemiCloud | 7.2 | — | — | 99.62% | $2.49 | Visit |
 SiteGround | 7.2 | — | — | 100% | $2.99 | Visit |
 Namecheap | 7.0 | — | — | 100% | $2.28 | Visit |
 Hostinger | 6.9 | — | — | 100% | $2.99 | Visit |
 Verpex | 6.8 | — | — | 99.97% | $2.50 | Visit |
 InterServer | 6.8 | — | — | 100% | $2.50 | Visit |
 FastComet | 6.8 | — | — | 100% | $2.49 | Visit |
 HostArmada | 6.8 | — | — | 99.85% | $2.49 | Visit |
 ScalaHosting | 6.7 | — | — | 100% | $2.95 | Visit |
 InMotion Hosting | 6.6 | — | — | 99.98% | $4.99 | Visit |
 Cloudways | 6.5 | — | — | 100% | $11.00 | Visit |
 TMDHosting | 5.7 | — | — | 99.99% | $9.52 | Visit |
Preguntas frecuentes
¿Cómo se clasifica el mejor Linux Hosting?+
Con una puntuación HostingTweaks específica del tipo: cada criterio (rendimiento, precio, fiabilidad y los factores propios de Linux Hosting) se calcula con datos reales y se pondera para este uso. Abre cualquier desglose “por qué” para ver el cálculo.
¿Las comisiones cambian la clasificación?+
No. Las clasificaciones se basan en datos y son iguales para todos; los enlaces de afiliado se divulgan y nunca alteran la puntuación ni el orden.