Bestes SSH Hosting (2026)
Das beste SSH Hosting, sortiert nach den wirklich relevanten Kriterien — echte Benchmarks, Specs, Verfügbarkeit und Preis, gewichtet für diesen Einsatzzweck. Transparente Bewertung, kein Bezahl-Ranking.
-
Hostwinds scores 10.0 for SSH Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 10.0 for SSH Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 64% 10.0 root/SSH Value 0% n/a no pricing yet Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 36% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
RunPod scores 9.9 for SSH Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and value (from $0.69/mo).
Why 9.9 for SSH Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 44% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 9.7 from $0.69/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 25% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 9.4 Visit
DigitalOcean scores 9.4 for SSH Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.4 for SSH Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 44% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 8.0 from $4.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 25% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 9.2 Visit
Hosting.com scores 9.2 for SSH Hosting, led by value (from $2.99/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.2 for SSH Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 0% n/a no access data Value 56% 8.5 from $2.99/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 44% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Kamatera scores 9.2 for SSH Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and value (from $4.00/mo).
Why 9.2 for SSH Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 44% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 8.0 from $4.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 25% 9.4 99.71% uptime (30d) Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Vultr scores 9.2 for SSH Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.2 for SSH Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 44% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 7.5 from $5.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 25% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Hetzner scores 9.2 for SSH Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and reliability (99.93% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.2 for SSH Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 44% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 7.7 from $4.59/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 25% 9.9 99.93% uptime (30d) Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Linode scores 9.2 for SSH Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and reliability (99.98% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.2 for SSH Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 44% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 7.5 from $5.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 25% 10.0 99.98% uptime (30d) Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Contabo scores 9.1 for SSH Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and reliability (99.86% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.1 for SSH Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 44% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 7.3 from $5.50/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 25% 9.7 99.86% uptime (30d) Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Cloudways scores 8.3 for SSH Hosting, led by control (root/SSH) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 8.3 for SSH Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Control 44% 10.0 root/SSH Value 31% 4.5 from $11.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 25% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
We earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It never changes our rankings: positions are set by our transparent HostingTweaks score, and commission only ever breaks a tie between genuinely comparable options.
Das Feld vergleichen
| Provider | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Hostwinds | 10.0 | — | — | 100% | — | Visit |
 RunPod | 9.9 | — | — | 100% | $0.69 | Visit |
 DigitalOcean | 9.4 | — | — | 100% | $4.00 | Visit |
 Hosting.com | 9.2 | — | — | 100% | $2.99 | Visit |
 Kamatera | 9.2 | — | — | 99.71% | $4.00 | Visit |
 Vultr | 9.2 | — | — | 100% | $5.00 | Visit |
 Hetzner | 9.2 | — | — | 99.93% | $4.59 | Visit |
 Linode | 9.2 | — | — | 99.98% | $5.00 | Visit |
 Contabo | 9.1 | — | — | 99.86% | $5.50 | Visit |
 Cloudways | 8.3 | — | — | 100% | $11.00 | Visit |
FAQ
Wie wird das beste SSH Hosting eingestuft?+
Über einen typ-spezifischen HostingTweaks-Score: jedes Kriterium (Leistung, Preis, Zuverlässigkeit und die für SSH Hosting spezifischen Faktoren) wird aus echten Daten berechnet und für diesen Einsatzzweck gewichtet. Öffne eine „Warum“-Aufschlüsselung für die Rechnung.
Ändern Provisionen das Ranking?+
Nein. Rankings sind datenbasiert und für alle gleich; Affiliate-Links sind ausgewiesen und ändern Score oder Reihenfolge nie.