Bestes Shared Hosting (2026)
Das beste Shared Hosting, sortiert nach den wirklich relevanten Kriterien — echte Benchmarks, Specs, Verfügbarkeit und Preis, gewichtet für diesen Einsatzzweck. Transparente Bewertung, kein Bezahl-Ranking.
-
IONOS scores 9.5 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $1.00/mo) and reliability (99.79% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.5 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 60% 9.5 from $1.00/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 40% 9.6 99.79% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 0% n/a no support data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 9.4 Visit
InterServer scores 9.4 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.50/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.4 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.8 from $2.50/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 9.9 3 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
FastComet scores 9.4 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.49/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.4 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.8 from $2.49/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 9.9 3 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 9.3 Visit
HostArmada scores 9.3 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.49/mo) and reliability (99.85% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.3 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.8 from $2.49/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 9.7 99.85% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 9.9 3 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 9.2 Visit
Hosting.com scores 9.2 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.99/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.2 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.5 from $2.99/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 9.9 3 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 9.2 Visit
ScalaHosting scores 9.2 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.95/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.2 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.5 from $2.95/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 9.9 3 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 9.2 Visit
SiteGround scores 9.2 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.99/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.2 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.5 from $2.99/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 9.9 3 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Hostinger scores 9.1 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.99/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.1 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 60% 8.5 from $2.99/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 40% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 0% n/a no support data Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
UltaHost scores 9.1 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $3.80/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.1 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.1 from $3.80/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 10.0 4 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 9.1 Visit
GreenGeeks scores 9.1 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.95/mo) and reliability (99.8% uptime (30d)).
Why 9.1 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.5 from $2.95/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 9.6 99.8% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 9.9 3 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Namecheap scores 8.9 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.28/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 8.9 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.9 from $2.28/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 6.6 2 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
Verpex scores 8.8 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.50/mo) and reliability (99.97% uptime (30d)).
Why 8.8 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.8 from $2.50/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 9.9 99.97% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 6.6 2 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
-
DreamHost scores 8.7 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.89/mo) and reliability (100% uptime (30d)).
Why 8.7 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.6 from $2.89/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 10.0 100% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 6.6 2 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 8.7 Visit
InMotion Hosting scores 8.7 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $4.99/mo) and reliability (99.98% uptime (30d)).
Why 8.7 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 7.5 from $4.99/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 10.0 99.98% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 9.9 3 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 8.6 Visit
ChemiCloud scores 8.6 for Shared Hosting, led by value (from $2.49/mo) and reliability (99.62% uptime (30d)).
Why 8.6 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 8.8 from $2.49/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 9.2 99.62% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 6.6 2 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
- 7.6 Visit
TMDHosting scores 7.6 for Shared Hosting, led by reliability (99.99% uptime (30d)) and value (from $9.52/mo).
Why 7.6 for Shared Hosting? +
Criterion Weight Score From Value 50% 5.2 from $9.52/mo Performance 0% n/a no benchmark yet Reliability 33% 10.0 99.99% uptime (30d) Load speed 0% n/a no LCP yet Support 17% 9.9 3 support channels Weights shown are normalised over the criteria we can measure for this type. Full methodology →
We earn a commission if you buy through some links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It never changes our rankings: positions are set by our transparent HostingTweaks score, and commission only ever breaks a tie between genuinely comparable options.
Das Feld vergleichen
| Provider | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 IONOS | 9.5 | — | — | 99.79% | $1.00 | Visit |
 InterServer | 9.4 | — | — | 100% | $2.50 | Visit |
 FastComet | 9.4 | — | — | 100% | $2.49 | Visit |
 HostArmada | 9.3 | — | — | 99.85% | $2.49 | Visit |
 Hosting.com | 9.2 | — | — | 100% | $2.99 | Visit |
 ScalaHosting | 9.2 | — | — | 100% | $2.95 | Visit |
 SiteGround | 9.2 | — | — | 100% | $2.99 | Visit |
 Hostinger | 9.1 | — | — | 100% | $2.99 | Visit |
 UltaHost | 9.1 | — | — | 100% | $3.80 | Visit |
 GreenGeeks | 9.1 | — | — | 99.8% | $2.95 | Visit |
 Namecheap | 8.9 | — | — | 100% | $2.28 | Visit |
 Verpex | 8.8 | — | — | 99.97% | $2.50 | Visit |
 DreamHost | 8.7 | — | — | 100% | $2.89 | Visit |
 InMotion Hosting | 8.7 | — | — | 99.98% | $4.99 | Visit |
 ChemiCloud | 8.6 | — | — | 99.62% | $2.49 | Visit |
 TMDHosting | 7.6 | — | — | 99.99% | $9.52 | Visit |
FAQ
Wie wird das beste Shared Hosting eingestuft?+
Über einen typ-spezifischen HostingTweaks-Score: jedes Kriterium (Leistung, Preis, Zuverlässigkeit und die für Shared Hosting spezifischen Faktoren) wird aus echten Daten berechnet und für diesen Einsatzzweck gewichtet. Öffne eine „Warum“-Aufschlüsselung für die Rechnung.
Ändern Provisionen das Ranking?+
Nein. Rankings sind datenbasiert und für alle gleich; Affiliate-Links sind ausgewiesen und ändern Score oder Reihenfolge nie.
Verwandte Typen entdecken
Cite this data
This dataset is updated on a schedule from our own reproducible, timestamped benchmarks. Free to cite with attribution and a link.
HostingTweaks, "Bestes Shared Hosting (2026)", https://hostingtweaks.com/best-shared-hosting, accessed 2026-08-16.